IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 16051 of 2024 Decided on: 04.01.2025 Roshan Lal …….Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 _____________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Ms. Ranjana Pathania, Advocate vice Mrs. Archana Dutt, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, Addl. AG for respondents –State. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that interest of justice would be served, in case, the representation made by the petitioner, appended with the petition as Annexure P-2 with regard to his grievance, is directed to be decided by the competent Authority within some reasonable time. 3. This writ petition is accordingly disposed of with the direction that the representation made by the petitioner, appended with the writ petition as Annexure P-2, shall be decided by the competent Authority, in light of the averments made therein as well 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 as the judgments being relied upon by the petitioner, if any, within a period of eight weeks from today, by passing a speaking order, in accordance with law. As pointed out by learned Additional Advocate General, the Authority shall go into the issue of delay and laches while deciding the representation. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge January 04, 2025 (narender)