MOHD SARFRAJ & ORS. v. STATE THROUGH SHO CONCERNED & ORS.
CRL.M.C./6063/2025 · 2025-09-24
Neena Bansal Krishna
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 28757 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 28757 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
$~77 & 19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
CRL.M.C. 6869/2025, CRL.M.A. 28880/2025
DANISH & ORS. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Nikhil Jayant, Ms. Rinku Parewa, Mr. Anmol Sharma, Mr. Vivek Karn, Mr. Govind Mohindra, Mr. Prabhanshu, Mr. Pradeep Dudy, Mr. Gaurav Bindal, Mr. Prakhar Upadhyay, Advocates. versus
STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondent
Through: Mr. Shoaib Haider, APP for State. Ms. Pinki Rani, Ms. Shivangi, Advocates for R-2. 19 + CRL.M.C. 6063/2025
MOHD SARFRAJ & ORS. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Nikhil Jayant, Ms. Rinku Parewa, Mr. Anmol Sharma, Mr. Vivek Karn, Mr. Govind Mohindra, Mr. Prabhanshu, Mr. Pradeep Dudy, Mr. Gaurav Bindal, Mr. Prakhar Upadhyay, Advocates. versus
STATE THROUGH SHO CONCERNED & ORS. .....Respondent
Through: Mr. Shoaib Haider, APP for State. Ms. Pinki Rani, Ms. Shivangi, Advocates for R-2. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 26/09/2025 at 11:40:35
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
O R D E R %
24.09.2025
9. The petitioners vide the present petitions under Section 528 of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seek quashing of cross FIRs No. 496/2021 under Section 323/341/452/506/34 IPC and FIR No.498/2021 under Section 323/341/452/504/506/34 IPC registered at P.S. Dayal Puri, Delhi and all proceeding emanating therefrom in view of the Settlement arrived at between the parties. 10. Issue notice. Learned APP accepts Notice on behalf of the State. 11. A request for quashing of the FIR has been made on account of the Settlement inter se the parties. It is stated that the parties are related to each other and are also neighbours and that the parties have amicably settled all their disputes. The parties have entered into MOU dated 02.08.2025 and have amicably settled all their disputes. The parties endorse the Settlement and shall remain bound by the terms of Settlement. 12. The parties are present before this Court in person today, and have been identified by their counsel and Investigating Officer concerned. 13. Today, the complainants who are present in Court state that they have no objection if the FIR is quashed. 14.
In view of the above facts that the parties have amicably resolved their differences out of their own free will and without any coercion and also the fact that the present matter is a neighbourhood matter it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. Moreover, there is no legal impediment in quashing the FIRs in question. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 26/09/2025 at 11:40:35
15. Accordingly cross FIRs No. 496/2021 under Section 323/341/452/506/34 IPC and FIR No.498/2021 under Section 323/341/452/504/506/34 IPC registered at P.S. Dayal Puri, Delhi, and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed. 16. The petitions stand disposed of. NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J SEPTEMBER 24, 2025/va This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 26/09/2025 at 11:40:35