APHC010410352019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 19681/2019 Between: 1. PASUPULA CHINNA OBULESU,, S/O. PEDDA PULLAIAH, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC-BUSINESS, R/O.VIDYA NAGAR, NEAR NOBLE SCHOOL, CHENNAMPALLE PANCHAYAT, BADVEL TOWN, Y.S.R. KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. PASUPULA GANGULAIAH,, S/O. PEDDA PULLAIAH, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, OCC-BUSINESS, R/O. VIDYA NAGAR, NEAR NOBLE SCHOOL, CHENNAMPALLE PANCHAYAT, BADVEL TOWN, Y.S.R. KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, (HOME DEPARTMENT), SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI, A.P. 2. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MYDUKURU DIVISION, Y.S.R. KADAPA DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, BADVEL URBAN, BADVEL, Y.S.R. KADAPA DISTRICT. 4. KURAKU CHINNA VENKATAIAH, S/O LATE PEDDA VENKATAIAH, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, OCC- AGRICULTURIST R/O. VIDYANAGAR, BADVEL, Y.S.R. KADAPA DISTRICT. 5. KURAKU RAMANAIAH, S/O LATE PEDDA VENKATAIAH, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, OCC- AGRICULTURIST R/O. VIDYANAGAR, BADVEL, Y.S.R. KADAPA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pass an appropriate writ order or direction particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the Badvel Urban, Y.S.R. Kadapa District, the 3rd Respondent herein in calling the Petitioners to the Police Station every day and make them sit till night under the guise of the enquiry into the false complaint, forcing the Petitioners to compromise the civil disputes, at the instance of the Respondents 4 and 5 herein as arbitrary, illegal, capricious and violative of fundamental rights guaranteed to the Petitioners under Articles 14, 19, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India with a consequential direction to the Respondents not to harass the Petitioners in connection with the said crime in the interest of justice IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondents herein not to harass the Petitioners under the guise of the enquiry into the false complaint at the instance of the Respondents 4 and 5 herein, in the interest of justice, pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. SIVALENKA RAMACHANDRA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 19681 of 2019 The Court made the following Order: Sri Sivalenka Ramachandra Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the cause in the present Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication. 2. Learned Additional Government Pleader representing the State is in attendance. 3. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI Dated: 04.09.2025 PSA 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO:19681 of 2019 Date: 04.09.2025 PSA