Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
209 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP-1890-2025 Date of Decision: 07.04.2025
RAMAN
….Petitioner Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL
Present: Mr. Karandeep S. Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Amit Kumar Goyal, Addl. A.G., Punjab.
****
DEEPAK SIBAL, J (ORAL)
1.
Learned State counsel submits that the petitioner has been granted parole rendering the prayer of the petitioner infructuous.
2.
Dismissed as infructuous.
3.
So far as the directions issued by this Court to the State to file an affidavit detailing therein the number of applications for parole pending final decision in the State of Punjab where the delay in their final disposal is beyond two months in concerned, learned State counsel prays for some more time to do the needful.
4.
List on 16.05.2025.
(DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE
(VIKRAM AGGARWAL)
JUDGE
07.04.2025
Prince Chawla Whether speaking/reasoned :
Yes/No. Whether reportable :
Yes/No.
PRINCE CHAWLA 2025.04.10 13:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document