Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28747 (KAR)

SMT. H P LOURD MARRY v. SRI CHINNAPPA

WP/14296/2020 · 2025-04-07

M I Arun

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:14949 WP No. 14296 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT PETITION NO. 14296 OF 2020 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. H.P. LOURD MARRY W/O BALARAJ AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS R/O HAROBELE VILLAGE UYYAMBALLI HOBLI KANAKAPURA TALUK DIST. RAMANAGARA. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. I.R.BIRADAR, ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. SRI. CHINNAPPA S/O PUTTARAJAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS 2. SRI. SHANTHAPPA S/O SANNAMARIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS 3. SRI. CHINNAPPA S/O JONSAPPA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS 4. SRI. HRUDAYARAJ S/O RAPEL APPA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS Digitally signed by H K HEMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:14949 WP No. 14296 of 2020 ALL ARE RESIDING AT HAROBELE VILLAGE UYYAMBALLI HOBI KANAKAPURA TLAUK DIST. RAMANAGARA. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. M.C.JAYAKIRTHI, ADVOCATE FOR R2 TO R4; R1 - SERVED & UNREPRESENTED) THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER ON I.A.NO.IV DATED 14.10.2020 PASSED BY THE LEARNED PRL.CIVIL JUDGE, KANAKAPURA, RAMANAGARAM IN O.S.NO.345/2013, BY ALLOWING THE SAID APPLICATION AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THROUGH PHYSICAL HEARING/VIDEO CONFERENCING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN ORAL ORDER None appears for the petitioner. 2. The writ petition is of the year 2020. Till now office objections have not been complied with. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the writ - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:14949 WP No. 14296 of 2020 petition. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE PGG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 17