DHIRENDRA YADAV AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
NA528/8226/2025 · 2025-03-11
Sanjay Kumar Pachori
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 28747 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 28747 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:36836 Court No. - 75 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 8226 of 2025 Applicant :- Dhirendra Yadav And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Akhilesh Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.
1. Sri Akhilesh Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the applicants and Sri P.K. Rai, learned brief holder for the State are present.
2. The present application under Section 528 of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been filed to quash the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 254 of 2021 (State Vs. Dhirendra Yadav and others), arising out of Case Crime No. 114 of 2019, under Sections 323, 504, 427 of I.P.C., Police Station Purani Basti, District Basti as well as cognizance/summoning order dated 15.1.2021, pending in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Basti.
3.
Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the cognizance/summoning order dated 15.1.2021 has been passed against the applicants and the magistrate took cognizance as a police case, which is against the provision of Section 2(d) of Cr.P.C.
4.
Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the offence punishable under Sections 323, 504, 427 of I.P.C. is non-cognizable offence and as per provision of Section 2(d) of Cr.P.C. the case could not be a State case and it has been proceeded as a State case, the cognizance/ summoning order is an abuse of the process of law.
5. Section 2(d) of Cr.P.C. is reproduced herein below: (d)"complaint" means any allegation made orally or in writing to a Magistrate, with a view to his taking action under this Code, that some person, whether known or unknown, has committed an offence, but does not include a police report.
2 Explanation.-A report made by a police officer in a case which discloses, after investigation, the commission of a non-cognizable offence shall be deemed to be a complainant, and the police officer by whom such report is made shall be deemed to be the complainant;
6. A bare perusal of explanation added to Section 2(d) shows that this explanation speaks about cases where police has investigated a cognizable case but investigation made discloses a non-cognizable offence.
7. In view of what has been stated above, the present application is
disposed of. The order impugned dated 15.1.2021 passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Basti is, hereby, quashed. The matter is remanded back to the court concerned and the Magistrate is directed to pass a fresh order after applying the judicial mind.
Order Date :- 12.3.2025 T. Sinha Digitally signed by :- TRIPTI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad