Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2874 (ORI)

BIBHUTI BHUSAN PANDIA v. STATE OF ODISHA

ABLAPL/15037/2025 · 2026-01-06

V Narasingh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL No.15037 of 2025 1. Bibhuti Bhusan Pandia 2. Charulata Pandia 3. Santilata Mohapatra 4. Banalata Mohapatra 5. Tarulata Mohapatra 6. Puspalata Rana 7. Radhakanta Nayak 8. Harihar Mohapatra 9. Niranjan Mohapatra 10. Nigamananda Mohapatra 11. Srinibash Rana …. Petitioners Mr. B. Tripathy, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha …. Opposite Party Mr. C. Mohanty, ASC CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH Order No. ORDER 06.01.2026 01. 1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and learned counsel for the State. 2. This ABLPAL has been filed apprehending arrest consequential to an F.I.R. to be instituted in Infovally P.S., Bhubaneswar, Dist.- Khordha, Odisha. p. 2 3. There is no cavil about maintainability of ABLAPL in the absence of an F.I.R. But on a close scrutiny of the recitals in the ABLAPL and on consideration of submissions of the learned counsel for the Petitioners, on the touchstone of the principles laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia & Others Vrs. State of Punjab, reported in (1980) 2 SCC 565 reiterated in Dhanraj Aswani Vrs. Amar S. Mulchandani and others reported in (2024) 10 SCC 336, this Court is ex facie not persuaded to hold that there is any reasonable apprehension of arrest of the Petitioners. 4. Liberty is granted to the Petitioners to renew their prayer, if there is any fresh cause of action to apprehend arrest. 5. Accordingly, the ABLAPL stands disposed of. (V. NARASINGH) Judge Soumya Designation: Jr. Stenographer