GAJANAND SHARMA S/O SH. BHAIRU RAM SHARMA v. CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL AND LABOUR COURT
SAW/952/2023 · 2025-05-21
Anand Sharma, Inderjeet Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 28739 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 28739 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:21453-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 952/2023 Gajanand Sharma S/o Sh. Bhairu Ram Sharma, Aged About 58 Years, R/o Village And Post Bhanpur Kalan, Tehsil Jamuva Ramgadh, District Jaipur. ----Appellant Versus
1. Central Government Industrial Tribunal And Labour Court, Cgo Complex Kendriya Sadan, Block B, First Floor, Sector- 10, Vidyadhar Nagar, Jaipur.
2. The Jaipur Nagaur Anchalik Gramin Bank, (At Present Rajasthan Marudhara Thar Gramin Bank )Joint Venture Of Govt. Of India, Govt. Of Rajasthan And State Bank Of India)), Through Its Chairman, Regional Office- Kisan Bhawan, Lal Kothi, Tonk Road, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : None present For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 21/05/2025
1. No one has put in appearance on behalf of the appellant, even in the second round.
2. We have perused the order-sheets of this Court, according to which after filing of this appeal not even on a single day the counsel for the appellant was present to argue the matter.
3. We have perused the record, this appeal has been filed by the appellant challenging the order dated 16.01.2001 after the delay of 8204 days.
[2025:RJ-JP:21453-DB] (2 of 2) [SAW-952/2023]
4. In our considered view, no sufficient explanation has been given by the appellant for filing the appeal after such a great delay.
5. In that view of the matter, no case is made out for interference.
6. The appeal as well as application for condonation of delay filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act both are dismissed.
(ANAND SHARMA),J (INDERJEET SINGH),J DAKSH/63