M/S THE JANA ENTERPRISES REPRESENTED THROUGH DILIP JANA, CONSTITUENT ATTORNEY v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THRO THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPT. OF HEALTH, MEDICAL EDUCATION
WPC/6553/2024 · 2025-04-21
Rajesh Shankar
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 28734 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 28734 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:11701-DB p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P.(C) No. 6553 of 2024 M/s The Jana Enterprises represented through Dilip Jana, Constituent Attorney, Son of Bamapada Jana, aged about 37 years, resident of 161, Bagpota Road, Sarsuna Sonali Park, P.O. & P.S.-Sarsuna, District-South Pargana, West Bengal-700061. ... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand through the Principal Secretary, Department of Health, Medical Education & Family Welfare, Government of Jharkhand, Nepal House, P.O. & P.S.-Doranda, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand-834002
2. Rajendra Institute of Medical Science through its Medical Superintendent cum Chairperson, Procurement Committee, Rajendra Institute of Medical Science at RIMS Circle, P.O. & P.S.- Bariatu, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand-834009.
3. The Chairperson, Procurement Committee, Rajendra Institute of Medical Science at RIMS Circle, P.O. & P.S.-Bariatu, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand-834009.
4. The Director, Rajendra Institute of Medical Science at RIMS Circle, P.O. & P.S.-Bariatu, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand-834009.
5. The Deputy Medical Superintendent, Rajendra Institute of Medical Science at RIMS Circle, P.O. & P.S.-Bariatu, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand-834009 ... Respondents
--------- CORAM:
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR
--------- For the Petitioner: Mr. A.K. Rashidi, Advocate
Ms. Aulia Begum, Advocate
Md. Azam, Advocate For the Respondents: Mr. Rajiv Ranjan, A.G.
Mr. A.K. Das, Advocate Dr. Ashok Kumar Singh, Advocate
Ms. Sharon Toppo, Advocate
--------- 02/Dated: 21.04.2025 M.S. Ramachandra Rao, C.J.(Oral)
1. Heard counsel for the petitioner, learned Advocate General for 1st respondent and Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, learned counsel for respondents 2 to 5.
2. Admittedly, the petitioner had been granted an extension of the work order issued on 06.07.2021 till 06.07.2025 vide a proceeding dt.
2025:JHHC:11701-DB p. 2 29.08.2023. Therefore, the respondents could not have issued a Notice Inviting Tender vide Annexure-4 covering the period up to
06.07.2025.
3. This legal position is not disputed by the counsel for the respondents.
4. Therefore, the NIT in question, i.e., Annexure-4, shall be construed as operative only from 07.07.2025 and not for any period prior thereto.
5. Writ petition is, accordingly, disposed off.
6. All pending applications, if any shall stand disposed off.
(M.S. Ramachandra Rao, C.J.)
(Rajesh Shankar, J.) Manoj/Pramanik/Cp.2