Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28732 (MAD)

MADHAN @ MADAN KUMAR v. STATE REP BY ITS SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE

CRL OP/6194/2025 · 2025-03-11

Sunder Mohan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl. O.P. No.6194 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 11.03.2025 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN Crl. O.P. No.6194 of 2025 Madhan S/o. Dhilkumar ... Petitioner / Accused Vs. The State represented by: The Sub-Inspector of Police, N2 Kasimedu Police Station, Chennai. (Crime No.112 of 2024). ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of BNSS, pleased to enlarge the petitioner on bail, in connection with the Crime No.112 of 2024, pending investigation on the file of the respondent Police. For Petitioner : Mr.K. Sarathkumar For Respondent : Mr. Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam Government Advocate (Crl.Side) O R D E R This Criminal Original Petition has been filed by the petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 26.04.2024, seeking bail in Crime 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl. O.P. No.6194 of 2025 No.112 of 2024 registered for the offences under Sections 8(c), 22(c) & 29(1) of NDPS Act. 2. The case of the prosecution is that the respondent police found the accused persons in illegal possession of 1920 Nitrovet tablets. Hence the case. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are false; that no contraband was recovered from this petitioner; that he has been implicated based on the confession of the co- accused and that in any case, considering the period of incarceration of the petitioner, further custody of the petitioner is not required and hence prayed for grant of bail. 4. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police, reiterated the prosecution case and on instructions, submitted that the petitioner has 22 previous cases. 5. The earlier bail application was dismissed by the Hon'ble Mrs Justice T.V.Thamilselvi by making following observations: 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl. O.P. No.6194 of 2025 "5. Considering the fact of the case, the contraband seized from the petitioner is commercial quantity. On seeing the gravity of the offence, this Court is not inclined to allow this petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed". This Court finds that there is no change in circumstances. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. 6. Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 11.03.2025 mjs To 1. The Sub-Inspector of Police, N2 Kasimedu Police Station, Chennai. 2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl. O.P. No.6194 of 2025 SUNDER MOHAN., J. mjs Crl. O.P. No.6194 of 2025 11.03.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis