AKHTAR JAVED CHISTI AND ORS v. STATE PANCHAYATI RAJ DEP ORS
CW/5799/2014 · 2025-01-22
Sameer Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 28727 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 28727 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5799/2014
1. Akhtar Javed Chisti S/o Shri Shaikh Moinuddin Chisti, aged 34 years, R/o Kagji Devra, Khatika Ki Gali, Bundi (Raj.)
2. Devkaran Sharangi S/o shri Bharatlal, aged 31 years, R/o H. No.10, Bharat Nagar Matoonga road, Bundi (Raj.)
3. Om Prakash Nagar s/o Shri Badrilal, aged 32 years, R/o via Kothya, Post Lalpura, Bundi (Raj.)
4. Shailendra gupta S/o Shri Purab Chand Gupta aged 30 years, R/o Village Sathoor, Tehsil Hindoli, District Bundi (Raj.)
5. Vikram singh S/o Shri Doongar Singh, aged 36 years, R/o House No.21, Jyotiba Phule Nagar, Bibanwa Road, Bundi (Raj.)
6. Khuman Singh S/o Bhanwar Singh, Aged 31 years, R/o Purana Matoonda Road, Indra Colony, Bundi (Raj.)
7. Madhav Raj S/o Durga singh, aged 30 years, R/o Dhowada Nagar, Matoonda Road, Bundi (Raj.)
8. Durga Shankar, Prajapati S/o shri Chaturbhuj Prajapati, R/o Kagji Devra, Khatiko ki Gali, Bundi (raj.) ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Panchayati Rajasthan through Principal Secretary, Rural Development and Panchayati Raj Department, (Group-III), Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. District Collector and District Programme Coordinate (NREGS), Bundi (Rajasthan)
3. Director (EGS), National Rural Employment Guarantee Programme, Rural Development and Panchayati Raj, Department, Jaipur.
4. Additional District Programme Coordinate, EGS Zila Parishad, Bundi (Raj.)
5. Block Coordinate and Sub-Divisional Officer, Bundi (Raj.)
6. Block Coordinate and Sub-Divisional Officer, Panchayat Samiti Hindoli, District Bundi (Raj.) ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : None Present For Respondent(s) :
(2 of 2) [CW-5799/2014] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 22/01/2025 The instant matter pertain to the year 2014. None has marked appearance qua the petitioners. Upon perusal of the Court file, it is noted that ever since filing of the petition no sincere efforts are taken by the learned counsel for the petitioner to contest the matter. Moreover, it can be deduced that during the currency of the petition much water has flown. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed in default. However, the petitioner(s) will be at a liberty to revive the petition if the lis in question still survives or if deemed essential. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.
(SAMEER JAIN),J DIKSHA MISHRA /66