- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20420 WP No. 16768 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 16768 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: M.T. RAMANNA S/O THIMMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS R/AT TIGALARA PALYA, MANGALA HAMLET, YEDIYUR HOBLI, KUNIGAL TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT - 572 111. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. M. JAYANTH, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. K.S. PONNAPPA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, MS BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. TAHASILDAR, KUNIGAL TALUK, TUMAKURU VILLAGE - 572130. Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20420 WP No. 16768 of 2025 3. SURVEY INSPECTOR, KUNIGAL TALUK, TUMAKURU VILLAGE - 572130. 4. TALUK SURVEYOR, KUNIGAL TALUK, TUMAKURU VILLAGE- 572130. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. NAVYA SHEKAR, AGA ) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED MEMO DATED 17.04.2025 ISSUED BY THE OFFICER OF TAHSILDAR KUNIGAL TALUK TUMKURU VILLAGE PERTAINING PROPERTY, BEARING NO.RRT:TAKARARU:CR 82/2024-25 VIDE ANNEXURE-C AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER 1. Smt. Navya Shekar, learned Additional Government Advocate is directed to take notice for the respondents. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20420 WP No. 16768 of 2025 2. In this writ petition, petitioner is assailing the memo dated 17.04.2025 issued by respondent No.3 as per Annexure- C. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that, as per Annexure-C, the respondents are interfering with the schedule property belonging to the petitioner. 4. Per contra, learned Additional Government Advocate submitted that Annexure-C is an internal departmental correspondence between the revenue authorities and same cannot be challenged unless the petitioner is aggrieved by the same. 5. In that view of the matter, taking into consideration the fact that Annexure-C is an internal correspondence between the Tahsildar, Kunigal Taluk and Revenue Inspector, Yadiyuru Hobli, and in view of the declaration of law in VINEESH M.V. Vs. STATE OF KERALA AND OTHERS reported in 2021 SCC OnLine KER 1275, I am of the view that, no interference is called for in this petition. However, it is open for the petitioner to approach - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20420 WP No. 16768 of 2025 competent authority for redressal of his grievances, in accordance with law. 6. The writ petition is accordingly rejected. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE sac List No.: 1 Sl No.: 31