RAHIL @ AAKDI S/O ALI MOHAMMAD v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/10887/2025 · 2025-08-28
Praveer Bhatnagar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 28704 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 28704 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:34515] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10887/2025 Rahil @ Aakdi S/o Ali Mohammad, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Bhandara, Police Station Jurhara, District Deeg (Raj.) (Petitioner Is In Judicial Custody In Sub Jail Deeg). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manish Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
Order 28/08/2025
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 511/2023 registered at Police Station Kaman, District Deeg for the offences under Sections 420, 406 and 120-B of IPC.
2.
Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the main allegation of deceiving the complainant and causing wrongful loss is against Mufeed and not against the present petitioner. It is also contended that the petitioner is in custody since long and trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused- petitioner may be allowed.
[2025:RJ-JP:34515] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-10887/2025]
3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and contended that the petitioner is a habitual offender and against him, 4 criminal cases for various offences are registered, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be dismissed.
4. Heard and perused the material available on record.
5. Considering the fact that the alleged offence against the petitioner are triable by magistrate. The accused-petitioner is in custody since long and the main allegation of deceiving the complainant is against Mufeed and not against the petitioner, therefore, considering the above facts, the bail application of the accused-petitioner is allowed.
6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Rahil @ Aakdi S/o Ali Mohammad, in connection with FIR No. 511/2023 registered at Police Station Kaman, District Deeg, shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/231