p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK BLAPL No.10849 of 2025 Amit Kumar … Petitioner Mr. T. Mishra, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha … Opposite Party Mr. S.C. Pradhan, Addl. PP Mr. P. Dash, Advocate(Informant) CORAM: JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY Order No. ORDER(ORAL) 02.02.2026 06. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical Mode). 2. This is a bail application U/S.483 of the BNSS by the petitioner for grant of bail in connection with Brahmanitarang PS Case No.94 of 2025 arising out of GR Case No.297 of 2025 pending in the Court of learned JMFC(R), Rourkela for commission of offences punishable U/Ss. 306/ 316(2)/ 336(3)/ 339/ 314/ 317(5)/ 338/ 318(3)/ 3(5) of BNS, on the main allegation of siphoning away the company’s money(SEETA AUTO CARE), who is dealing with sale of new vehicles of KIA Motors, along with co-accused person in the sale of new cars in exchange of old cars. 3. Heard, Mr. Tapan Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner; Mr. Pratik Dash, learned counsel for the informant and Mr. S.C. Pradhan, learned Addl. PP in the matter and perused the record. Page 2 of 3 4. At the outset, Mr. Tapan Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner apprises this Court that the matter has already been settled, which was confirmed by Mr. Pratik Dash, learned counsel for the informant. In that view of the matter, since the Petitioner is an employee of the Company and he has already made settlement with his own company and taking into account the other circumstances on record in entirety including the liability of the Petitioner to the Company and keeping in view the inherent right of the accused to be presumed innocent until proven guilty at the trial and regard being had to the pre trial detention of the Petitioner in custody since 27.05.2025 with submission of charge sheet in the meantime, this Court without expressing any view on merits, admits the petitioner to bail, but in order to obviate the apprehension of Mr. Dash, learned counsel for the informant for the Petitioner to be a flight risk, this Court imposes appropriate conditions. 5. Hence, the bail application of the petitioner stands allowed and the petitioner is allowed to go on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) only with two solvent sureties for the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Court in seisin of the case on such terms and conditions as deem fit and proper by it with following conditions:- (i) the petitioner shall surrender his passport, if any and if not, swear an affidavit to that effect, (ii) the petitioner in the course of trial shall attend the trial Court on each date of p. 3 posting without fail unless his attendance is dispensed with. In case the Petitioner fails without sufficient cause to appear in the Court in accordance with the terms of the bail, the learned trial Court may proceed against the Petitioner for offence U/S.269 of BNS,2023 in accordance with law, (iii) the petitioner shall not leave the State without prior permission till disposal of the case by intimating his present address of stay to the concerned Court, (iv) the Petitioner shall inform the Court as well as the Investigating Agency as to his place of residence during the trial by providing his mobile number(s), residential address, e-mail, if any, and other documents in support of proof of his residence. The Petitioner shall not change his address of residence without intimating to the Court and Investigating Agency and (v) in case the Petitioner misuses the liberty of bail and in order to secure his presence, proclamation U/S.84 of BNSS, 2023 is issued and the Petitioner fails to appear before the Court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the learned trial Court is at liberty to initiate proceeding against him for offence U/S.209 of BNS, 2023 in accordance with law. 6. Accordingly, the BLAPL stands disposed of. Issue urgent certified copy of the order as per Rules. (G. Satapathy) Judge Priyajit