Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:1214 WP No. 1051 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 1051 OF 2021 (GM-RES) BETWEEN:
1. SMT.GANGAMMA W/O LATE PUPPANNA, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, THIMMANAHALLI NERLIGER, HASSAN TALUK AND DISTRICT-573 125. 2. PALAKSHA MURTHY S/O LATER PUPPANNA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, NO.83, THIMMANAHALLI, NERLIGE VILLAGE, HASSAN TALUK AND DISTRICT-573 125. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. PAVAN KUMAR., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. L.SRINIVASA BABU., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, M.S.BUILDING, BENGALURU-560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, HASSAN DISTRICT, HASSAN-573 125. 3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT,
Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:1214 WP No. 1051 of 2021
HASSAN DISTRICT, HASSAN-573 125. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MANJUNATHA RAYAPPA., AGA)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER Sri.Pavan Kumar., counsel on behalf of Sri.L.Srinivasa Babu., for the petitioners and Sri.Manjunatha Rayappa., AGA for the respondents have appeared in person. 2. The captioned Writ Petition is filed seeking following reliefs: I. Issue a Writ of Mandamus with a direction to the respondents to fix the fair compensation of the acquired petitioners land in Sy.No.15 and Sy.No.94 situated at Niligirikavalu Village, Javagal Hobli, Arasikere Taluk, Hassan. II. Issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider the representations dated 25.11.2020
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:1214 WP No. 1051 of 2021
and 25.11.2020 filed by the petitioner vide Annexures-J and K respectively. 3. Counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are not pressing prayer (i). The oral submission about non-pressing of prayer (i) is placed on record. 4. As far as prayer (ii) is concerned, counsel for the petitioners submits that a Mandamus may be ordered directing the respondents to consider the representations submitted by the petitioners. AGA submits that an appropriate order may be passed. 5. The grievance of the petitioners is that they have made representations in the year 2020 and the same are not considered as of today.
Hence, a Mandamus is ordered directing the respondents to consider the representations dated 25.11.2020 submitted by the petitioners vide Annexures-J and K in accordance with the law if not considered as of today, within eight weeks from the receipt of certified copy of this order. - 4 -
NC: 2025:KHC:1214 WP No. 1051 of 2021
6. Resultantly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. This Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 3 Sl No.: 24