Harish Kumar Vs. Prem Lata & Ors. CMP(M) No. 2221/2025 12.05.2026 Present: Mr. T.R. Jain, Advocate, for the applicant/appellant. Mr. B.N. Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No. 1 to 3. Respondents No. 4 & 5 are ex parte. Ms. Dhanvanti Devi, Advocate, for respondent No. 6. CMP(M) No. 2221/2025 No reply to the application is intended to be filed and learned counsel for the non- applicants/respondents have no objection in case the delay is condoned. Heard. Having regard to the averments made in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit of the applicant, this Court finds sufficient cause to condone the delay of one year, eight months and four days’ that has occurred in filing the present appeal. Consequently, the application is allowed and delay of one year, eight months and four days’ that has occurred in filing the present appeal, is condoned. The application stands disposed of. FAO No. /2026 Appeal be registered. ...2... Notice. Mr. B.N. Sharma and Ms. Dhanvanti Devi, Advocates, accept service of notice on behalf of respondents No. 1 to 3 and respondent No. 6, respectively. Let notice be issued to respondents No. 4 & 5 returnable within four weeks, on taking steps within three days. List thereafter. As prayed for, be tagged alongwith FAO (MV) No. 309 of 2025. CMPST No. 64450/2025 Learned counsel for the applicant states that the applicant is not in a position to deposit the awarded amount. Therefore, at this stage, the application is dismissed. ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge 12th May, 2026 (raman)