Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28689 (RAJ)

MEENAKSHI DAUGHTER OF LATE SH. MANOHAR SINGH SHEKHAWAT W/O BHANWAR SINGH RAJPUT v. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE

CW/13094/2025 · 2025-09-08

Anand Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:35790] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13094/2025 Meenakshi Daughter Of Late Sh. Manohar Singh Shekhawat W/o Bhanwar Singh Rajput, Aged About 35 Years, R/o 149, Rajput Mohalla, Tilora, Pushkar, Ajmer (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus District And Sessions Judge, Ajmer. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arihant Samdaria for Mr. Sunil Samdaria For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 08/09/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that father of the petitioner was serving as Class-IV employee in the office of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nasirabad, Ajmer, who died in harness on 08.12.2012, leaving the entire family in financial distress. Thereafter, although the petitioner filed one application for seeking compassionate appointment on 17.10.2023, yet till this date, the same has not been decided by the respondent. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that his prayer in the writ petition is confined only to the extent that the respondents may be directed to decide the application seeking compassionate appointment filed by the petitioner. 3. In view of the limited prayer, the writ petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of with direction to the respondents to decide the application for compassionate appointment, if any, filed [2025:RJ-JP:35790] (2 of 2) [CW-13094/2025] by the petitioner within a period of two months from the date of the receipt of certified copy of this order strictly in accordance with the law. 4. It is made very clear that the Court has not expressed any opinion on merits. (ANAND SHARMA),J NEERU/12