IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.7332 of 2024 ------ 1. Md. Israil Ansari, aged about 55 years, Son of Usman Ansari 2. Bablu @ Afroj Ansari @ Md. Afroz Ansari, aged about 22 years, son of Md. Israil Ansari 3. Anish Ansari, aged about 16 years, Son of Md. Israil Ansari 4. Abu Bakar Ansari, aged about 42 years, Son of Guljar Ansari All resident of Village & Post-Araju, P.S.-Jaridih, Dist.-Bokaro .... .... …. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Aditya Banerjee, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sanath Kumar Jha, Addl. P.P ------ Order No.05 Dated- 04-03-2025 I.A. No.2518 of 2025 This interlocutory application has been filed for early hearing. Since the anticipatory bail application can be heard today itself, the said interlocutory application is disposed of as being infructuous. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) A.B.A. No.7332 of 2024 Heard the parties. Apprehending their arrest in connection with Jaridih P.S. Case No.111 of 2024 instituted under sections 190, 191(2), 191(3), 115(2), 118(1), 109 & 303(2) of the B.N.S. 2023, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners being the member of an unlawful assembly armed with deadly weapon attempted to murder Mansoor Alam and committed theft of Rs.50,000/-. It is next submitted that the allegations against the petitioners are false. It is further submitted that for the self-same occurrence from the side of petitioners, the petitioner No.1 instituted Jaridih P.S. Case No.112 of 2024. It is also submitted that the petitioners undertake that they will not annoy or disturb the informant/victim or their family member in any manner during the pendency of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioners undertake to co-operate with the investigation of the case and to furnish sufficient security including cash security. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be given the privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl. P.P appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners. Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within six weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrendering, they will be enlarged on bail on depositing Rs.10,000/- each as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Bermo at Tenughat in connection with Jaridih P.S. Case No.111 of 2024 with the condition that they will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish their mobile numbers and photocopy of the Aadhar Cards with an undertaking that they will not change their mobile numbers during the pendency of the case and they will not annoy or disturb the informant/victim or their family member in any manner during the pendency of the case and further conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Rohit/