2025:HHC:6241 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.15975 of 2024 Decided on: 17.03.2025 Smt. Anita Devi … Petitioner Versus The State of Himachal Pradesh & others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 ____________________________________________________ _ For the petitioner : Mr. Subhash Chander, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Rahul Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents No.1 to 3- State. Ms. Seema Guleria, Advocate, for respondents No.4 and 5. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and having perused the relief prayed for, this Court is of the considered view that the present Writ Petition is completed misconceived as venture of purchase of a vehicle by the petitioner form a private entity and raising a loan for purchase thereof again form a private entity is not a dispute which can be gone into by this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 2. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is permitted to withdraw this petition, with liberty to have access such statutory remedy as may available in law. 3. The petition stands disposed of. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge March 17, 2025 (Rishi) 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?