Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28679 (PNJ)

JINESH CHAND JAIN v. VIJAY VARDHAN IAS AND ORS

COCP/766/2021 · 2025-05-20

Harkesh Manuja

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

112 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No. 766 of 2021 (O&M) Date of Decision: 20.05.2025 Jinesh Chand Jain .......... Petitioner Versus Sh. Vijay Vardhan, IAS, Secretary to Govt. of Haryana, Urban Estates Department, Civil Secretariat, Chandigarh and others .......... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Present: Mr. Abhinav Sood, Advocate, and Ms. Achintaya Soni, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ravi Dutt Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana for respondent Nos. 1 to 3. Mr. H.S. Gill, Advocate for respondent No. 4-HUDA (now HSVP) **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) CM-4876-CII-2025 Application for placing on record additional facts alongwith some documents, moved on behalf of the applicant-petitioner, is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The same is taken on record. Registry to do the needful. MAIN CASE Copy of letter dated 15.05.2025 written by the Administrator, HSVP, Rohtak to the Chief Administrator (Legal Cell), HSVP, Panchkula, produced by learned counsel for respondent No. 4, is taken on record as Mark-‘X’. Registry to tag / paginate the same at the appropriate place in the Dinesh Kumar 2025.05.20 19:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document COCP No. 766 of 2021 (O&M) [2] paper-book. [2] Learned counsel for respondent No. 4-HSVP submits that the case of petitioner towards release of acquisition of his land situated in Village Garhi Bohar, District Rohtak has been considered positively; the recommendation to the release of said land are pending consideration with the Chairman of HSVP and the same shall be considered and concluded within four weeks from today. [3] In view of the aforesaid undertaking made on behalf of respondent No. 4, learned counsel or the petitioner does not press the present petition any further. [4] Dismissed as not pressed. [5] However, in case the needful is not done as per undertaking, salary of respondent No. 1, upto the extent of one-third, shall remain attached till such compliance is made. [6] Needless to say that in case the Chairman of HSVP approves the release of land in favour of the petitioner, necessary corrections in the revenue record shall be made within four weeks thereafter. [7] Rule stands discharged. [8] Since, the main case itself has been decided / dismissed as not pressed, therefore, no orders are required to be passed in the pending application(s), and the same shall stand disposed off. May 20, 2025 ( HARKESH MANUJA ) 'dk kamra' JUDGE Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Dinesh Kumar 2025.05.20 19:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document