is.- APHC010408702025 la^s hM IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI ' -j TUESDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HON BLE SRI JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, CHIEF JUSTICE AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI lA No.1 OF 2Q2fi IN/AND WRIT APPEAL NO: 894 OF 2025 lA No.1 OF 202f^ Between: Nanda Subba Rao, S/o. Nanda Veeraswamy. Aged about 50 of Ramannapalem, Sarugudu, Andhra Pradesh - 531 115 years, Resident ...APPELLANT/THIRD PARTY AND 1. Jartha Lakshman Rao, S/o. Late Ganeshwara years, Occ; Business, R/o. Kakarapadi Village Visakhapatnam District. Rao, Aged about 41 Koyyuru Mandal, ...RESPONDENT N0.I/WRIT PETITIONER Forest Department, Rep by 2. Union of India, Ministry of Environment and its Secretary, New Delhi 3. The District Level Committee, Under the Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers Recognition of Forest Rights Act 2006, rep. by Its Chairperson Collector and District Magistrate, Kakinada 4. District Forest Officer, Kakinada Division, Kakinada, Kakinada District 5. The Divisional Forest Officer, Kakinada Division, Kakinada, Kakinada District 6. The Principal Chief Conservator of Forest and Head of Forest Force, Government of Andhra Pradesh^.Mangalagiri, Guntur District 7. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep by its Principal Secretary, Mines and Geology Department, Secretariat, Amaravati, Guntur District 8. The Commissioner and Director, Mines and Geology, Ibrahimpatnam, Krishna District. 9. The Executive Engineer, Trible Welfare Division, Rampachodavaram Alluru Sitaramaraju District 10. The Executive Engineer, Panchayat Raj Department, Kakinada, Kakinada District 11. The Forest Range Officer, Yeleswaram, Kakinada District. ...RESPONDENT Nos.2-11/RESPONDENT Nos.1 -10 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant leave to file the present Writ Appeal against the Order dated 23.04.2025 in WP No. 10477 of 2025, pending disposal of the present Writ Appeal. WRIT APPEAL NO: 894 OF 2025 Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 23.04.2025 in W.P. No. 10477 of 2025 on the file of High Court. lA NO: 3 OF 709^ Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the impugned order dated 23.04.2025 passed in W.P. No. 10477 of 2025 pending the disposal of the writ appeal. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI D. S. SIVADARSHAN Counsel for the Respondent No.1 :SRI V. V.SATISH Counsel for the Respondent No.2:SRI NARASIMHARAO GUDISEVA (CENTRAL GOVT COUNSEL) Counsel for the Respondent Nos.3 to 6 & 11:GP FOR FORESTS Counsel for the Respondent Nos.7 & 8:GP FOR MINES AND GEOLOGY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.9 & 10: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEVELOPMENT The Court made the following : JUDGMENT Bench Sr.No:-47 [3483] APHC010408702025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI rf I.A.No.l of 2025 in/and Writ Appeal No: 894 of 2025 ...Appellant Nanda Subba Rao Vs. ...Respondents Jartha Lakshman Rao and others ********** Mr. D. S. Sivadarshan Advocate for Appellant: Mr. V. V. Satish, GP for Panchayat Raj Rural Dev, GP for Forests, Mr. Narasimharao Gudiseva (Central Govt Counsel), GP for Mines and Geology Advocates for Respondents: CORAM :THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI : 12*^ August, 2025. DATE PC : Interlocutory Application No.1 of 2025 has been filed seeking leave to prefer writ appeal against an interim order dated 23.04.2025 passed in W.P.No.10477 of 2025. At this stage, we do not want to comment on whether the petitioner can at all be said to be ‘person aggrieved’ of the order which is sought to be challenged before us, yet, considering the fact that this is only an interim order 2. 2 HCJ & RCJ IA_1_25 in/and WA 894 2025 \ and the learned Smgle Judge is still seized of the matter and anything said by this Court would severely prejudice the outcome of the writ proceedings, we do not find any good ground for granting leave to file writ appeal. However, we leave the petitioner free to avail the appropriate remedy. Accordingly, the I.A. is dismissed. Consequently the Writ Appeal also stands dismissed. No order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, in this appeal, shall stand closed. Sd./- V.DIWAKAR DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTTON OFFICER To, 1. One CC to Sri D. S. Sivadarshan, Advocate [OPUC] 2. One CC to Sri V. V. Satish, Advocate [OPUCj 3. One CC to Sri Narasimharao Gudiseva (Central Govt. Counsel) [OPUC] 4. Two CCs to GP for Panchayat Raj and Rural Development, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 5. Two CCs to GP for Forests, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 6. Two CCs to GP for Mines arrd Geology, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 7. Two CD Copies ssb HIGH COURT DATED: 12/08/2025 ORDER ^ 28 AUG 2025 g ^ . Current Suction lA No.1 OF 2025 in/and WA No. 894 OF 2025 DISMISSING THE lA No.1 of 2025 & W.A WITHOUT COSTS