APHC010408372025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTYFIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 21069 OF 2025 Between: Kodidala Peda Venkata Subbaiah, S/o.Ramaiah, Hindu, aged about 68 years Occ: Business, R/o G3 legend Apartment Road No.11, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad 500034 ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Department of Revenue Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District, A.P. 2. The Commissioner and Inspector General of Stamp and Registration, State of A.P. Amaravati now at Vijayawada. 3. The Collector and District Magistrate, Annamayya District, at Rayachoti, 4. The District Registrar, Annamayya District at Rayachoti, 5. The Sub Registrar, Rayachoti, Annamayya District, 6. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Rayachoti Division, Annamayya District. 7. The Tahsildar, Rayachoti Mandal, Annamayya District. 8. Mantri Reddaiah, S/o.Venkatesu, aged 52 years, R/o. 51/142-5-19-1, Kothapeta Nagar, Rayachoti, Kadapa District, 9. Pagadala Sreenivasulu, S/o. Venkayya, aged 53 years Ramalayam Street, Rayavaram Vil, Sundupalle Mandalam, Kadapa District-516129, Principal Secretary, R/o. 3/147, % ■ Veli Chalamala Baba Fakruddin, S/o.lmam Saab, aged 42 years, R/o 1/1, Diyyalavandia Palli, Lakkireddipalle, Kadapa District- 516257, Peyyala Praveen Kumar, S/o.Venkata Krishnaiah, aged 43 years, R/o. 3/35, Gudavandlapally, Chintha Kommadinne, Y S R Kadapa District- 516003, Kowuri Srinadh Reddy, S/o.Chinnappa Reddy, aged 36 years, R/o. 1/1, Kovvurivandlapalli, Ramapuram, Neelakantharaopeta, Y S R Kadapa District- 516504, Peni Mekala Reddapaiah, S/o.Naganna, aged 45 years. Door No. 4/48, Daniyani Cheruvu, Nambulapulakunta, Satya Sai District- 515521. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. Gottimitia Sai Nadh Reddy, S/o. G.Panduranga Reddy, aged about 43 years, R/o. Majara Pakki Reddy Gari Palli, Galiveedu Mandal, Annamayya District. Mugi Reddappa, S/o. M.Venkata Ramana Kesapuram Village, Devalampeta Annamayya District. Nandaluru Sukumar Reddy, Lakshmi Reddy, Aged 35 years, R/o, Bandapalli Village othururupalli Post, Ramapuram Mandalam Annamayya District. K Mallikarjuna, S/o. Kuppam Ameen Peer,Aged 45 years, R/o. D.No.8/416,. Kadapa Post, Mandal and District. 15. aged 36 years, Chirma Mandem Mandal, 16. 17. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction fully one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in not taking any action on the Representations of the Petitioner more dated 12-06-2025, 23-07-2025 to the Registration Department, 17-03-2025 22-07-2025 to the - Revenue Authorities is illegal, improper, arbitrary in violation of provisions of Constitution of India besides being opposed the principles of Natural Justice consequently direct the Official Respondents to cancel the Regd. Sale Deed Doct.No.6964/2021 dated 31-07-2021. dated 01-06-2022, registered at Kadapa Rural Sub Registrar Office, Sale deed document No. 15835 /2024 dt. 04-10-2024, Doct.No.l8168/2024 dt. 26-12-2024, Sale Deed Doct.No. 18169/2024 dated 26-12-2024 , Sale Deed Doct.No.18171/2 024 dt. 26-12-2024 registered in Sub Registrar Office, Rayachoty. Rectification Deed No. 4774/2022 Sale Deed lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents not to make any further Registrations in respect of land without total Re-survey of land in Sy.No.1/1 Khasba Gollapalle, Rayachoti Mandal Annamaiah District pending disposal of the Writ Petition in the interest of Justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI KOTESWARA RAO MUMMANENI Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1,3,6 and 7: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 2, 4 and 5: GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS The Court made the following order: APHC010408372025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] TUESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No. 21069 of 2025 Between: 1. KODIDALA PEDA VENKATA SUBBAIAH,V ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, N ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more fully one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in not taking any action on the Representations of the Petitioner dated 12.06.2025, 23.07.2025 to the Registration Department, 17.03.2025, 22.07.2025 to the Revenue Authorities is illegal, improper, arbitrary in violation of provisions of Constitution of India besides being opposed the principles of Natural Justice consequently direct the Official Respondents to cancel the Regd. Sale Deed Doct.No.6964/2021 dated 31.07.2021, Rectification Deed No.4774/2022 dated 01.06.2022, registered at Kadapa Rural Sub Registrar Office, Sale deed document No. 15835/2024 dt.04.10.2024, Sale Deed Doct.No. 18168/2024 dt.26.12.2024, Sale Deed Doct.No. 18169/2024 dated 26.12.2024, Sale Deed Doct.No.18171/20 24 dt.26.12.2024 registered in Sub Registrar Office, Rayachoty and pass such further orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.KOTESWARA RAO MUMMANENI Counsel for the Respondent: 9 ^ ■ 1GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following; ORDER: Pithily, this Writ Petition is filed on the grounds that representations dated 12.06.2025 and 23.07.2025 were made to the authorities, but they were not addressed. Therefore, it is urged that the respondents be directed to address the representations, as such direction would suffice in the circumstances of the case. 2. In the judgment of Hon’ble Apex Court in The Government of India vs P. Venkatesh reported in (2019) 15 SCC 613 held that: Dispose of the representation’ mantra is increasingly permeating the judicial process in the High Courts and the Tribunals. Such orders may make for a quick or easy disposal of cases in overburdened adjudicatory institutions. But, they do not service to the cause of justice. The litigant is back again before the Court, as this case shows, having incurred attendant costs and suffered delays of the legal process. This would have been obviated by calling for a counter in the first instance, thereby resulting in finality to the dispute. 3. This Court is not oblivious of the fact that a Court to authorities, before directing "consideration" of a claim or representation should examine whether the claim or representation is with reference to a "live" issue or whether it is with reference to a "dead" or "stale" issue, if it is with reference to a "dead" or "stale" issue or dispute, the Court/tribunal should put an end to the matter and should not direct consideration or reconsideration. If the Court to Tribunal deciding to direct "consideration" without itself examining the merits, it should make it clear that such consideration will be without prejudice to any contention 4 relating to limitation or delay and laches. Even if the Court does not expressly say so, that would be the legal position and effect." Disposal of proceedings by seemingly innocuous orders directing consideration of representation though result in quick or easy disposal of cases in overburdened adjudicatory institutions, but such orders do more disservice than service to the cause of justice. 4. However, the respondents are directed to consider the petitioner's representation, examine the same thoroughly, issue orders accordingly, and communicate the decision to the petitioner. It goes without saying that the entire process will be completed within six weeks from the date the order is received. 5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. 6. As a sequel thereto. Interlocutory Applications pending, if any shall stand closed. Sd/- K TATA RAO DEPUTYiREGiSTRAR //TRUE COPY// FICER SECTl To, The Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue, State of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat, Veiagapudi, Guntur District, A.P. The Commissioner and Inspector General of Stamp and Registration, State of A.P. Amaravati now at Vijayawada. The Collector and District Magistrate, Annamayya District, at Rayachoti, The District Registrar, Annamayya District at Rayachoti, The Sub Registrar, Rayachoti, Annamayya District, 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Rayachoti Division, Annamayya District. 7. The Tahsildar, Rayachoti Mandal, Annamayya District. 8. One CC to Sri. Koteswara Rao Mummaneni Advocate [OPUC] 9. Two CCs to GP for Revenue High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] Two CCs to GP for Registration and Stamps, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] Two CD Copies 10. 11. GSC 1 HIGH COURT DATED:12/08/2025 I 4 \ ORDER WP NO. 21069 OF 2025 DISPOSING THE WP WITHOUT COSTS