Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28672 (KAR)

ANIL K KEMBAR v. K PUSHPARAJ SHETTY

RSA/1941/2021 · 2025-08-01

V Srishananda

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2023:KHC:30757 RSA No. 1941 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2023 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1941 OF 2021 (RES) BETWEEN: 1. ANIL K. KEMBAR S/O. M. SRINIVASA SALIAN AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/AT FLAT NO.G-1 ”PROVIDENCE BLISS” ALAPE VILLAGE, PADIL MANGALURU-575 007. …APPELLANT (BY SRI VISHNU, ADVOCATE FOR SRI SACHIN B.S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. K. PUSHPARAJ SHETTY S/O. LATE K. NARAYANA SHETTY AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS R/AT SHETTY COMPUND NEAR GARODI, KANKANADY POST MANGALURU-575 002. …RESPONDENT THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 22.03.2021 PASSED IN R.A.NO.258/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, AND CJM, MANGALURU, D.K, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND FILED AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 13.11.2019 PASSED IN O.S.NO.573/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE, MANGALURU, D.K. Digitally signed by SHARANYA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2023:KHC:30757 RSA No. 1941 of 2021 THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the client is not responding to pay the Court fee, inspite of the same being intimated. Hence, it is clear that the appellant is not interested in pursuing the matter by making good the Court fee. 2. The submission of the learned counsel for the appellant is placed on record. 3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non- compliance of office objections and non-payment of Court fee. Sd/- JUDGE ST List No.: 1 Sl No.: 33