Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28671 (KAR)

SHRINATH H V v. MUNIRAJU

MFA/5056/2019 · 2025-01-25

K Natarajan

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:3397 MFA No. 5056 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.NATARAJAN MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 5056 OF 2019 (CPC) BETWEEN: SHRINATH HV, S/O DR HB VASUDEVA MURTHY, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/AT # 305, 6TH MAIN, 9TH BLOCK NAGARABHAVI 2ND STAGE, BENGALURU-560072. APPELLANT (BY SMT. PRIYANKA BV., ADVOCATE FOR SMT. POONAM S PATIL.) AND: 1. MUNIRAJU, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, S/O NOT KNOWN, R/AT NAGAWARA VILLAGE, ARABIC COLLEGE POST, BENGALURU-560045. 2. MANJU, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, S/O NOT KNOWN, R/AT NAGAWARA VILLAGE, ARABIC COLLEGE POST, BENGALURU-560045. 3. LAKSHMINARAYANA P, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, S/O LATE PUTTAPPA, R/AT NAGAWARA VILLAGE, GOVINDARAJANAGARA, Digitally signed by NIRMALA DEVI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:3397 MFA No. 5056 of 2019 CORPORATION COLONY, BENGALURU-560079. 4. CHANDRU, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, S/O NOT KNOWN, R/AT NAGAWARA VILLAGE, ARABIC COLLEGE POST, BENGALURU-560045. 5. PURUSHOTHAM, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, S/O NOT KNOWN, R/AT NAGAWARA VILLAGE, ARABIC COLLEGE POST, BENGALURU-560045. 6. VISHWANATH, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, S/O NOT KNOWN, R/AT NAGAWARA VILLAGE, ARABIC COLLEGE POST, BENGALURU-560045. RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. RG HEGDE.,ADVOCATE FOR R1, R2, R4 AND R5.) THIS MFA IS FILED U/O. 43 RULE 1 (r) OF CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 12.06.2019, PASSED ON IA.3, IN O.S. NO.3477/2019, ON THE FILE OF THE XXX ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU, DISMISSING THE IA.3 SEEKING FOR EXTENSION OF INTERIM ORDER AND ETC,. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.NATARAJAN - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:3397 MFA No. 5056 of 2019 ORAL JUDGMENT 1. Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo for withdrawing the appeal. 2. The submission is placed on record. 3. In view of the above submission, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. 4. Pending interlocutory application do not survive for consideration. Sd/- (K.NATARAJAN) JUDGE PNV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 25