[2025:RJ-JP:36508] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 4th Bail Application No. 10891/2025 Rajesh Pancholi @ Raju @ Rdx @ Drugs S/o Suresh, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Bansha Kushalpura, Police Station Samod, District Jaipur Rural. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Neem Ka Thana, District Sikar). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Anushree Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 10/09/2025 1. The instant 4th bail application has been filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. on behalf of accused-petitioner. The accused- petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.306/2023, registered at Police Station Shrimadhopur, District Sikar, for the offence(s) under Sections 307 and 458 of IPC and Sections 3/25 and 3/27 of the Arms Act. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the third bail application of the petitioner was dismissed vide order dated 30.05.2025. It is further contended that other co-accused Shyamlal and Anil Meena have already been granted bail by this Court and the trial Court respectively and case of the present petitioner is not distinguishable from the other co-accused Anil Meena. It is further contended that specific allegations of opening the fire are against other co-accused Rahul Yadav and child in [2025:RJ-JP:36508] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-10891/2025] conflict in law, who have already been enlarged on bail, therefore, the 4th bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and contended that vide order dated 30.05.2025, this Court, after elaborately dealing with the statements of the witnesses dismissed the petitioner’s bail application on merits. It is further contended that no change in circumstances have been recorded, therefore, the present 4th bail application of the petitioner deserves to be dismissed. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. This Court vide order dated 30.05.2025, has elaborately dealt with the statements of the witnesses against the petitioner and dismissed the 3rd bail application of the petitioner on merits. As the present bail application has been filed on the same grounds, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the instant 4th bail application filed by the accused-petitioner is hereby dismissed. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Ashwani Kr Srivastava /-30