IISHAK KHAN SON OF SHRI SHAHJAD v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
HC/316/2025 · 2025-09-03
Bhuwan Goyal, Inderjeet Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 28664 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 28664 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:35349-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition No. 316/2025 Iishak Khan Son Of Shri Shahjad, Aged About 40 Years, Resident Of Gav Mewada, Manpur, Shyopur, Madhya Pradesh, Presently Resident Of 691, Shankar Lal Khatik Ka Makan, Krishi Nagar, Goverdhan Nagar, Malpura Gate, Jaipur City (East), Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Home Affairs, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. The Additional Director General Of Police, Anti Human Trafficking Unit, Jaipur (Raj.)
3. Deputy Commissioner Of Police, Jaipur City (East).
4. Sho Police Station Malpura Gate, District Jaipur City (East) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Megha Sharma & Mr. Parth Sharma on behalf of Mr. Nikhil Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jitendra Singh Rathore, Addl. G.A. Mr. Muninder Singh, SI SHO, Police Station Malpura Gate, District Jaipur City (East) HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL
Order 03/09/2025
1. This habeas corpus petition has been filed by the petitioner with regard to illegal detention of his daughter.
2. Today the concerned Police Officer has produced the corpus before this Court. Admittedly, the corpus is below 18 years of age
[2025:RJ-JP:35349-DB] (2 of 2) [HC-316/2025] and this fact has been confirmed by counsel for the petitioner as well as by learned Additional Government Advocate.
3. We have interacted with the corpus and she has firmly stated before this Court that she wants to go and live with the petitioner (her father) who is present in the Court.
4. Considering the statement made by the corpus before this Court and also considering the fact that she is below 18 years of age, the custody of the corpus is handed over to the petitioner (her father) in the Court today itself.
5. In that view of the matter, this habeas corpus petition stands
disposed off.
(BHUWAN GOYAL),J (INDERJEET SINGH),J Sudeepak/1-C