Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28662 (RAJ)

POOJA SINGH @ NEETU SINGH @ PRIYA D/O LATE SHRI KAILASH SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/10909/2025 · 2025-09-18

Praveer Bhatnagar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:38349] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10909/2025 Pooja Singh @ Neetu Singh @ Priya D/o Late Shri Kailash Singh, Aged About 31 Years, R/o H.no. 270, Housing Board, Bhilai, Near Subhas Chowk, Ward No. 15, Industrial Area Bhilai, P.s. Jamuna, Chhattisgarh. (Presently Is Confined In Central Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary with Mr. Himanshu For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 18/09/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 383/2025 registered at Police Station Mansarovar, District Jaipur City (South) for the offences under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 111(2)(b), 111(3) and 61(2) of BNS and Sections 66C and 66D of IT Act. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the other co-accused Mukesh Pareek, Shailendra and Rohitashv Kumar Swami have already been enlarged on bail and the case of the present petitioner is not distinguishable from the other co-accused. The charge-sheet has already been submitted and the petitioner is in custody since [2025:RJ-JP:38349] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-10909/2025] 14.05.2025 and the trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. It is not desirable to express anything on the merits of the case. Considering the fact that the other co-accused have already been enlarged on bail. The accused-petitioner is in custody since 14.05.2025 and the trial of the case may take considerable time, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 of BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Pooja Singh @ Neetu Singh @ Priya D/o Late Shri Kailash Singh, in connection with FIR No. 383/2025 registered at Police Station Mansarovar, District Jaipur City (South), shall be enlarged on bail provided she furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for her appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/11