RAMESH @ GOLU AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
A482/1545/2025 · 2026-05-06
Nand Prabha Shukla
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2866 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2866 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 1545 of 2025 Court No. - 78 HON'BLE NAND PRABHA SHUKLA, J.
1. Heard Mr. Sudhakar Shukla, learned counsel for the applicants, Mr. Prashant Mishra holding brief of Mr. Abhinav Trivedi, learned counsel for the opposite party No. 2, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The present application under Section 528 BNSS has been filed with a prayer to quash the entire proceeding of Case No. 22414 of 2024 (State v. Ramesh @ Golu and Others) arising out of Case Crime No. 164 of 2024 under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506, 354-A, 427 IPC and Section 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, P.S.-Rura, District-Rampur Dehat as well as impugned cognizance/summoning order dated 04.10.2024 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division) FTC/CAW, Kanpur Dehat. 3. From the perusal of the material on record and looking into the facts of the case, at this stage, it cannot be said that no offence is made out against the applicants. All the submissions made at the bar relate to the disputed questions of fact, which cannot be adjudicated upon by this Court. Only in cases where the Court finds that there has been failure of justice or abuse of procedure, this power may be exercised to prevent the abuse of process to secure the ends of justice. 4. Accordingly, prayer for quashing is declined. 5. In case, the applicants are not on bail, it is directed that if the applicants appear or surrender through counsel before the Trial Court and makes an Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sudhakar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Abhinav Trivedi, Adarsh Kumar, G.A. Ramesh @ Golu And 3 Others .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s)
application for bail within 45 days from the date of the order, the same shall be considered and disposed of expeditiously, after giving opportunity to the other side. 6. However, in the interest of justice, it is further provided that in case the applicants move an application for discharge at an appropriate stage through counsel within 45 days, the same shall be disposed of by the Trial Court by a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law within two weeks thereafter. 7.
For a period of 45 days or till the disposal of the discharge application, whichever is earlier, no coercive measures shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case. 8. With the aforesaid direction, this application is disposed of. May 7, 2026 Aditya Tripathi A482 No. 1545 of 2025 2 (Nand Prabha Shukla,J.) Digitally signed by :- ADITYA TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad