APHC010409382025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION N BETWEEN: 1. P NAGULAIAH, 50 YEARS, R/o TIRUPATI TOWN, TIRUPATI URBAN MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 3. THE JOINT COLLECTOR, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 4. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TIRUAPTI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 5. THE TAHSILDAR, TIRUPATI RURAL MANDAL. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No. 21085/2025 P NAGULAIAH, S/o. P. SUBRAMANYAM, AGED ABOUT o. D.No.19-10-111, NEW INDIRA NAGAR, TIRUPATI TOWN, TIRUPATI URBAN MANDAL, TIRUPATI ...PETITIONER AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI GUNTUR DISTRICT. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI THE JOINT COLLECTOR, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TIRUAPTI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. THE TAHSILDAR, TIRUPATI RURAL MANDAL. ...RESPONDENT(S): IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3330] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO . P. SUBRAMANYAM, AGED ABOUT 111, NEW INDIRA NAGAR, TIRUPATI TOWN, TIRUPATI URBAN MANDAL, TIRUPATI ...PETITIONER THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI THE JOINT COLLECTOR, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TIRUAPTI, ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents 2 to 5 in not implementing the ryotwari patta granted in SR No. 98/11 (a)/65-CGR, dt. 21.01.1966 in revenue records as patta land of the petitioner and not mutating the entries in record of rights in respect of the land in Sy. Nos. 278/2 Ac. 0- 86 cents, 278/3 Ac.0-64 cents, 278/6 Ac. 1-36 cents, 279/2 Ac. 0-59 cents, 279/3 Ac. 0-59 cents, 279/8 Ac. 0-22 and 279/9 Ac. 0.27 cents, total extent Ac.4.53 cents situated at Tiruchanuru Revenue Village, Tirupati Rural Mandal as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the 5th respondent to implement the ryotwari patta granted in SR No. 98/11 (a)/65- CGR, dated. 21.01.1966 and enter the name of the petitioner as pattadar and enjoyer in respect of the land in Sy. Nos. 278/2 Ac. 0-86 cents, 278/3 Ac.0-64 cents, 278/6 Ac. 1-36 cents, 279/2 Ac. 0-59 cents, 279/3 Ac. 0-59 cents, 279/8 Ac. 0-22 and 279/9 Ac. 0.27 cents, total extent Ac.4.53 cents situated at Tiruchanuru Revenue Village, Tirupati Rural Mandal in record of rights and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P GANGA RAMI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for the following relief/s: …pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents 2 to 5 in not implementing the ryotwari patta granted in SR No.98/11(a)/65-CGR, dt.21.01.1966 and enter the name of the petitioner as pattadar and enjoyer in respect of the land in Sy.Nos.278/2 Ac.0.86 cents, 278/3 Ac.0-64 cents, 278/6 Ac.1-36 cents, 279/2 Ac.0-59 cents, 279/3 Ac.0-59 cents, 279/8 Ac.0-22 and 279/9 Ac.0.27 cents, total extent Ac.4.53 cents situated at Tiruchanuru Revenue village, Tirupati Rural Mandal in record of rights and pass such other or further order….. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would request this Court that it would suffice to direct the respondents to consider the representation dated 15.07.2025. 3. Without going into the merits of the case, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the Respondent No.5-Tahsildar, to examine the representation dated 15.07.2025 warily and pass appropriate orders after giving opportunity of hearing to the 4 petitioner herein, in accordance with law. It is needless to say, the decision shall be communicated to the petitioner within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of order. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 19.08.2025 Harin 5 212 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHARA RAO W.P.No. 21085 OF 2025 Date: 19-08-2025 Harin