Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28653 (JHR)

LARSEN AND TOUBRO LIMITED THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY MR. TAPAS SEN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cont.(Cvl)/2/2025 · 2025-07-28

Sujit Narayan Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:20766-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No. 1114 of 2024 WITH Cont. Case (Civil) No. 01 of 2025 WITH Cont. Case (Civil) No. 02 of 2025 WITH Cont. Case (Civil) No. 03 of 2025 LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED, a Company within the meaning of Section 2(2) of the Companies Act, 2013, having its registered office at L&T House, Ballard Estate, Narottam Morarji Road, Mumbai 400001 and its Construction Division's headquarters at Mount Poonamallee Road, Manapakkam, P.B. No. 979, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, through its Authorized Signatory namely Mr. Tapas Sen, son of Shri Pulin Bhari Sen, aged about 53 years, resident of Pushpanjali, Line No. 3, Bank Colony, Kokar, Ranchi, P.O. G.P.O. P.S. Lalpur, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand. ... Petitioner (in all cases) Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Avinash Kumar, Managing Director, Jharkhand Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited, having his place of business at Engineers Building, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District- Ranchi-834004, Jharkhand. 3. Theophil Kullu, Finance Controller, JBVNL, having its office at Engineers Building, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi-834004, Jharkhand. ... Opposite Parties (in all cases) --------- CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD --------- For the Petitioner: Mr. Nitin Kumar Pasari, Advocate Mr. Shubham Choudhary, Advocate For the Opp. Parties: Mr. Ashok Kumar Yadav, Sr. S.C.-I --------- 05/Dated: 28.07.2025 Tarlok Singh Chauhan, C.J.(Oral) 1. Since the Hon’ble Supreme Court is already seized of the matter with regard to not only the main judgment but has also taken note of the instant Contempt proceedings which have been ordered to 2025:JHHC:20766-DB be stayed, we are of the considered view that the rights of the parties would now ultimately be governed by the determination to be made by the Hon’ble Supreme Court. In this view of the matter, these Contempt Petitions stand disposed of at this stage. (Tarlok Singh Chauhan, C.J.) (Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.) N.A.F.R. Manoj/Pramanik/Cp.2