VIJAYALAKSHMI HYDRO POWER P LTD v. CHAMUNDESHWARI ELECTRICITY SUPPLY COMPANY LIMITED
WP/18493/2021 · 2025-06-10
Jyoti Mulimani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 28649 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 28649 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19685 WP No. 18493 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 18493 OF 2021 (GM-KEB) BETWEEN:
VIJAYALAKSHMI HYDRO POWER (P) LTD., NO.104 AND 105, "RR TAKT", 37, BHOOPASANDRA MAIN ROAD, SANJAYANAGAR, BANGALORE-560 094, INDIA REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY, MR. NARAYANADAS JAJU. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RUDRESH., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. ANISH ACHARYA., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
CHAMUNDESHWARI ELECTRICITY SUPPLY COMPANY CORPORTATION LIMITED, ENERGY BILLING CELL, CORPORATE OFFICE, NO.29, VIJAYANAGARA 2ND STAGE, MYSURU-570 017.
REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.
2.
CHIEF ENGINEER (CIVIL DESIGNS), KARNATAKA POWER CORPORATION LTD., NO.22/23, SUDARSHAN COMPLEX, SHESHADRI ROAD, BENGALURU-560 009.
3.
KARNATAKA POWER CORPORATION LIMITED REGISTERED OFFICE: SHAKTI BHAVAN, 82, RACE COURSE ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001.
REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SABAHA SULTANA., ADVOCATE FOR
Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19685 WP No. 18493 of 2021
SRI. SHAHBAAZ HUSAIN., ADVOCATE FOR R1;
SRI. ARUN KUMAR.V.S., ADVOCATE FOR R2 & 3)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.
THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER Sri.Rudresh., counsel on behalf of Sri.Anish Acharya., for the petitioner appeared in person and seeks time to comply with the office objections. This Court is not inclined to grant time. The reason is plain. The petition is listed today for orders regarding non- compliance of office objections. As could be seen from the petition papers, the objections raised at the scrutiny stage are not yet complied with. The petition is filed in the year 2021. Now we are in the month of June, 2025. It's almost four years, the office objections are not complied with. Despite the grant of time, the office objections are not complied with. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non compliance of office objections.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19685 WP No. 18493 of 2021
Because of dismissal of the Writ Petition, interim order if any stands discharged and pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 39