Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28645 (PNJ)

SATPAL v. RAM KANWAR

CR/721/2021 · 2025-09-02

Vikas Bahl

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CR-721-2021 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH *** CR-721-2021 Date of decision : 02.09.2025 Sat Pal ... Petitioner Versus Ram Kanwar ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present: Mr.Sushil Jain, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Harish Bhardwaj, Advocate and Mr. Saurabh, Advocate for the respondent. VIKAS BAHL, J.(ORAL) 1. On 20.08.2025, this Court was pleased to pass the following order:- “Present:- Mr. Sushil Jain, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Jasleen Kaur, Advocate for Mr. Harish Bhardwaj, Advocate for the respondent. **** Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the matter has been settled and formal agreement would be executed shortly and thus, prays for an adjournment. Adjourned to 02.09.2025. To be taken up in the urgent list. Davinder Kumar 2025.09.02 16:32 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order / judgment CR-721-2021 2 20.08.2025” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that inspite of several efforts, the petitioner has not picked up his phone. It is submitted that in the said circumstances, the present petition be disposed of but liberty be granted to the petitioner to revive the same in case the matter is not finally settled and if any cause survives. 3. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of with the aforesaid liberty. (VIKAS BAHL) JUDGE September 02, 2025. Davinder Kumar Whether speaking / reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No Davinder Kumar 2025.09.02 16:32 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order / judgment