Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28641 (ORI)

DEEPAK HARIPAL v. STATE OF ODISHA

ABLAPL/4384/2025 · 2025-04-23

V Narasingh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL No. 4384 of 2025 1. Deepak Haripal 2. Dinesh Haripal …. Petitioners Mr. P.K. Mishra, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha …. Opposite Party Mr. S. Panigrahi, ASC CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH Order No. ORDER 23.04.2025 01. 1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and learned counsel for the State. 2. The Petitioners are seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with G.R. Case No.263 of 2023 pending on the file of learned S.D.J.M., Sonepur arising out of Sonepur P.S. Case No.277 of 2023 for commission of offences punishable under Sections 341/326/307/506/34 of IPC. 3. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer. 4. Taking into account the nature of allegation qua the Petitioner No.2, this Court is not inclined to entertain the application for pre-arrest bail in respect of Petitioner No.2 (Dinesh Haripal). 5. Accordingly, the ABLAPL in respect of Petitioner No.2 (Dinesh Haripal) stands rejected. 6. So far as ABLAPL in respect of Petitioner No.1 (Deepak Haripal) is concerned, considering the background in which the allegation is leveled, it is directed that on surrendering within three weeks hence and moving for bail, the Petitioner No.1 (Deepak Haripal) shall be released on bail by the learned Court in seisin on such terms as deemed just and proper. 7. Before releasing the learned Court shall verify as to whether order of this Court has been assailed before the Apex Court and if so, the result thereof. 8. It is needless to state that the Petitioner shall cooperate with the ongoing investigation. 9. Accordingly, the ABLAPL stands disposed of. 10. U.C.C. as per rules. (V. NARASINGH) Judge Santoshi Designation: Senior Stenographer