HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 23241 of 2025 Court No. - 65 (Sr. No.58 out of 205) HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Sri Kuldeep Singh Yadav, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Abhishek Shukla, learned counsel for the informant as well as Ms. Ifrah Islam, learned State Law Officer for the State and perused the material placed on record. 3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.161 of 2025, under Sections 64, 352, 351(3) BNS, Police Station Kaarari, District Kaushambi, during the pendency of trial. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The FIR is delayed by about five days and there is no explanation of the said delay caused. The victim is major aged about 19 years and she herself instituted the FIR. There is no medical corroboration of the incident, as such, it is a clear cut case of false implication. The applicant has no criminal history and is in jail since 10.5.2025. He undertakes to cooperate with the trial and not misuse the liberty of bail. 5. Learned counsel for the informant and learned State Law Officer have vehemently opposed the bail application but the submissions raised by the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ajay Singh Yadav, Dhirendra Babu Mishra, Kuldip Singh Yadav, Ravindra Kumar Mishra, Vishvajit Tiwari, Yogesh Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Abhishek Shukla, G.A. Usman .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) learned counsel for the applicant could not be disputed. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the evidence on record, taking into consideration the delay in institution of FIR coupled by the fact that there is no medical corroboration of the incident, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, prima-facie the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed. 7. Let the applicant- Usman, be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to verification of sureties, with the conditions that he shall not tamper with evidence or intimidate witnesses and shall appear before the trial court as required. 8. Breach of any condition shall entail cancellation of bail. The observations herein shall not affect the trial on merits. May 5, 2026 Vikas Verma BAIL No. 23241 of 2025 2 (Krishan Pahal,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIKAS VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad