APHC010409562024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3712/2024 Between: Sarvepalli Danam and Others O Anand Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. THANJAVURU VENKATA SUMAN Counsel for the Contemnor: 1. NAGARAJU NAGURU The Court made the following This Contempt Case i Courts Act against the respondents for willful disobedience of the orders dated 01.02.2024 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No. 2. When the matter is taken up for counsel for the petitioners, submitted that the order of this Court has been complied with by the respondents, however with certain delay, as such, prayed to pass appropriate orders. 3. On the other hand, Sri contemnor, contended that due to administrative reasons orders could not be IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3712/2024 Sarvepalli Danam and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND ...CONTEMNOR Counsel for the Petitioner(S): THANJAVURU VENKATA SUMAN Counsel for the Contemnor: NAGARAJU NAGURU The Court made the following order: This Contempt Case is filed under Section 10 to 12 of The Contempt of against the respondents for willful disobedience of the orders dated passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.2384 of 2024. When the matter is taken up for hearing today, Sri T.V.Suman , submitted that the order of this Court has been complied with by the respondents, however with certain delay, as such, prayed to pass appropriate orders. On the other hand, Sri Nagaraju Naguru, learned counsel contemnor, contended that due to administrative reasons orders could not be IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3332] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI ...PETITIONER(S) ...CONTEMNOR s filed under Section 10 to 12 of The Contempt of against the respondents for willful disobedience of the orders dated man, learned , submitted that the order of this Court has been complied with by the respondents, however with certain delay, as such, , learned counsel for sole contemnor, contended that due to administrative reasons orders could not be complied with in time and it is neither wilful nor wanton. Accordingly, prayed to close the writ petition. 4. Perused the record and considered the submissions. 5. It is brought to the notice of this Court that order has been complied with however with certain delay. This Court is satisfied for the reasons mentioned in the counter-affidavit that there is no wilful disobedience. As such, this Court is inclined to close the contempt case. 6. Accordingly, contempt case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 9th January, 2025 TJN 209 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3712/2024 Dated:09.01.2025 TJN HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3712/2024 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No. Date ORDER OFFICE NOTE 04. 09.01.2025 RC, J The Contempt Case is closed. (Vide separate order) ______ RC, J TJN