APHC010408172002 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 20921/2002 Between: 1. PRECOT MILLS STPL BOUBLING UNIT, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT., REP. BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY SRI K.C.H.VENKATA REDDY, KODIGINAHALLI, H.S.MANDIR HINDUPUR, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT, S/O.KOTIREDDY, R/O.HINDUPUR ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE GENERAL SECRETARY STPL DOUBLING UNIT ANANTAPUR DISTRICT, STPL Doubling Unit, Kodiginahalli, H.S.Mandir, Hindupur, Ananthapur District. ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ or direction calling for the records relating to the order of the Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Ananthapur passed in I.D.NO.93/98 DATED 22.1.2002 and quash the same and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2002(WPMP 26189 OF 2002 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings pursuant to the order of the Industrial Tribunal- cum-Labour Court, Ananthapur passed in I.D.No.93/98 dated 22-1-2001 pending disposal of the Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. O MANOHER REDDY Counsel for the Respondent: 1. The Court made the following: ORDER: Sri O.Manohar Reddy, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner, submits that the petitioner has not been in contact with him for a long time. As such, they have no instructions as to whether anything survives in the writ petition or not. 2. Since the matter pertains to the year 2002 and the petitioner has not been pursuing the case through his advocate, it shows that the petitioner has no interest in prosecuting the matter. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. However, if the petitioner feels that the cause still survives, he can file appropriate application within a period of two (02) months. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 07.08.2025 JLV