Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28629 (RAJ)

PUSHPENDRA SINGH S/O KARAN SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/10823/2025 · 2025-09-08

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:36398] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10823/2025 Pushpendra Singh S/o Karan Singh, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Bishanpura, Police Station, Saithal, District Dausa (Rajasthan) (Presently Confined In District Jail, Dausa). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10825/2025 Deepak Kumar S/o Shri Radhamohan, R/o Chatari Wali Dhani, Police Station Kotwali Dausa, District Dausa (Raj.). (The Accused Petitioner Presently Confined In District Jail, Dausa). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajneesh Gupta with Mr. Aamir Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 08/09/2025 1. The present bail applications under Section 483 of BNSS are filed by the applicants-accused Pushpendra Singh S/o Karan Singh and Deepak Kumar S/o Shri Radhamohan seeking bail in respect of a criminal case registered as FIR No.338/2025 dated 11.07.2025 registered at P.S. Kotwali District – Dausa, for the offence under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 109(1), 351(2) of BNS. [2025:RJ-JP:36398] (2 of 4) [CRLMB-10823/2025] 2. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants have been falsely implicated in the matter and the investigation against them is complete and they are no more required in investigation. He further submits that there are no chance of fleeing of applicants accused from the jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court. The applicants do not have any criminal antecedents. He also submits that the applicants undertake not to repeat offence and cooperate with investigation/trial, which will take time. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that for incident of 10.07.2025, report is registered on next date after taking legal advice. He further submitted that petitioner Pushpendra is not named in FIR and role is not mentioned by complainant. He further submitted that role and involvement of Deepak is not mentioned in the report. Further it is submitted that medical and X-ray report of both injured Dinesh and Gyan were procured by police and except injury No.14 upon Dinesh, all are simple in nature. He further submitted that injury No.14 is not on vital part. He also submitted that there is no criminal antecedent against Pushpendra but two criminal cases triable by First Class Magistrate were registered against Deepak. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that the allegations are grave and serious in nature. 5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner-accused and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record by both the parties. [2025:RJ-JP:36398] (3 of 4) [CRLMB-10823/2025] 6. On the basis of complaint lodged by injured Gyan on 11.07.2025, report is registered against Rajendra, Abhishek, Deepak, Sanjay and others and matter is investigated. At the time of registration of report, Gyan Singh was discharged after primary treatment but Dinesh was referred to Jaipur. The injury report indicated that Gyan has sustained 12 injuries and all are simple in nature. Dinesh has sustained 14 injuries and except injury No.14, all are simple in nature. Injury No.14 is on right thigh, which is fracture on femur bone. There is no criminal antecedent against Pushpendra, who is not named in FIR but his involvement was found by police and there are two other criminal cases against Deepak. 7. Upon hearing the arguments and perusing the record, we have found that the applicants-accused are no more required in the investigation and they are in custody for quite some time. The further proceedings will take its own time, therefore, looking to entirety of facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the Court deems it appropriate to grant bail to the applicants-accused. 8. Thus, the instant bail applications filed on behalf of applicants-accused Pushpendra Singh S/o Karan Singh and Deepak Kumar S/o Shri Radhamohan, is hereby allowed and the applicants-accused are ordered to be released on bail with condition that each of the petitioners would furnish a personal bond of ₹50,000/- with two sureties [2025:RJ-JP:36398] (4 of 4) [CRLMB-10823/2025] of like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the following conditions:- (i) The applicants-accused shall not tamper with evidence or influence the witness in any manner. (ii) The applicants-accused shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law. (iii) The applicants-accused shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court. (iv) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the applicants-accused shall be liable to be canceled. 9. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Trial Court through E-mail. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /208-209