1 2025:CGHC:26520 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 4745 of 2025 1 - Dinu Tandon S/o Ramadhar Tandon Aged About 21 Years R/o Village Paraswani P.S. Palari District - Balodabazar - Bhatapara (C.G.) Presently R/o Dhabadeeh P.S. City Kotwali Balodabazar District - Balodabazar - Bhatapara (C.G.) ... Applicant versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station City Kotwali Balodabazar , District - Balodabazar - Bhatapara (C.G.) ... Respondent For Applicant : Mr. Aadil Minhaz, Advocate For Respondent : Mr. Bharat Gulbani, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board 20.06.2025 1. This is the second bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of regular bail to the applicant who has been arrested in connection with Crime No. 15/2025 registered at Police Station City Kotwali, District Baloda Bazar-Bhatapara (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section109,3(5) of BNS. 2. The applicant had preferred a first bail applicant bearing MCRC No. 2809 of 2025 which was dismissed vide order dated VAISHALI LUCKY NAGARIA Digitally signed by VAISHALI LUCKY NAGARIA Date: 2025.06.24 10:28:07 +0530 2 09.04.2025, thereafter, he preferred Second bail application for granting regular bail. 3. Facts of the case are that on 06.01.2025 a report was lodged by the complainant Gangesh Sonwani stating that at about 4 a.m. he was informed that his brother Hariyali and nephew Sandeep had gone to Primary School Ground of village Dhabadeeh where they had quarrel with Dinu Tandon and Ramadhar Tandon, who assaulted them with hand and fists. It was further stated that Dinu Tandon has also caused injuries with a sharp edged weapon. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present matter. He also submits that there is no incriminating material against the applicant. He also submits that the complainant and injured witnesses have been examined and have not supported the prosecution case. He also submits that the co-accused has already enlarged on bail vide order dated 20.03.2025 passed in MCRC No. 2202 of 2025. The applicant is in jail since 10.01.2025 and the conclusion of trial is likely to take some time, therefore, he prays for releasing the applicant on regular bail. 5. On the other hand, learned State counsel opposes the bail application and submits that though the co-accused has been granted bail by this Court, but as per the prosecution case, it was the applicant, who is said to have assaulted the injured with a sharp knife and caused injuries to him, therefore, he is 3 not entitled for grant of bail. 6. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case diary. 7. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that though the co-accused has been granted bail by this Court but as per the prosecution case, it was the applicant/Dinu Tandon, who is said to have assaulted the injured with a sharp knife and caused injuries to him, this Court is of the opinion that it is not a fit case to enlarge the applicant of bail. 8. Accordingly, the second bail application of the applicant- Dinu Tandon, involved inCrime No. 15/2025 registered at Police Station City Kotwali, District Baloda Bazar-Bhatapara (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section109,3(5) of BNS. 9. Office is directed to provide a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information and compliance. Sd/- Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) vaishali CHIEF JUSTICE