- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:2224 WP No. 18383 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 18383 OF 2021 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI M.S.RENUKUMAR AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, S/O LATE SIDDALINGAPPA, R/O SECOND MAIN ROAD, BEHIND YATHIDRA CONVENT, HEMAVATHI NAGAR, HASSAN-573 201. 2. SRI VISHWANATHACHAR AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, S/O MUKUNDACHAR, R/O 4TH CROSS, NEAR PARK SHANTHINAGAR, HASSAN-573 201. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. P.S.MOHAN., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. CHOLAMANDALUM INVESTMENT AND FINANCE COMPANY LTD., DARE HOUSE 2, N.S.C.BOSE, ROAD PARRYS, CHENNAI-600 001. REP.BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER, SRI.FRANCIS ROZARIO ARUN RAJ. 2. SRI MANJUNATHA N R AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, S/O LATE RAMEGOWDA, R/O SRI RANGANATHA NILAYA, 8TH CROSS, 3RD MAIN ROAD, BEHIND POST OFFICE, Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:2224 WP No. 18383 of 2021 HEMAVATHI NAGARA, HASSAN-573 201. 3. SMT PALLAVI A R AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, W/O MANJUNATH N R, R/O SRI RANGANATHA NILAYA, 8TH CROSS, 3RD MAIN ROAD, BEHIND POST OFFICE, HEMAVATHI NAGARA, HASSAN-573 201. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SREEDEVI., ADVOCATE FOR SRI.JAI.M.PATIL., ADVOCATE FOR R1; R2 & 3 ARE SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Smt.Sreedevi., counsel on behalf of Sri.Jai M.Patil., for respondent No.1 has appeared in person. 2. The Possession Notice dated 15.09.2021 vide Annexure-E is called into question in this Writ Petition on several grounds as set-out in the Memorandum of Writ Petition. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:2224 WP No. 18383 of 2021 3. Counsel for respondent No.1 on instruction submits that the petitioners have vacated the property in question and the first respondent has taken the possession of the same as of today. Counsel therefore, submits that an appropriate order may be passed. The oral submission made by counsel for respondent No.1 is placed on record. 4. Because of the vacating of the property in question as of today, nothing survives for consideration in the Writ Petition at this juncture. The Writ Petition is devoid of merits and is liable to be dismissed. 5. Resultantly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 2 Sl No.: 30