Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28606 (JHR)

SHATRUGHNA PRASAD v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT

WPC/77/2025 · 2025-01-21

Sri Ananda Sen

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI WP(S) No.77 of 2025 ----- Shatrughna Prasad, aged about 62 years, s/o late Loki Prasad, r/o Dibha Mohalla, PO and PS Chatra, District Chatra, Jharkhand … Petitioner(s). Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand through the Principal Secretary, Department of Rural Development, Govt. of Jharkhand 2.The Principal Secretary, Department of Rural Development, Govt. of Jharkhand 3. Deputy Commissioner-cum-Chairman, District Rural Development Agency, Chatra 4.Director, Directorate of Economy and Statistics, Department of Planning and Development, Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi 5.Block Development Officer, Hazaribagh … Respondents. CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mrs. Chaitali C. Sinha, AC to AAG IA …...... 04 /21.01.2025: The petitioner in this writ petition has prayed for grant of benefits of 1st ACP and 1st MACP and consequential revision in the post retiral benefits. He also prays that his representation may be directed to be disposed of. 2. The learned counsel for the respondents submits that if fresh representation is filed by the petitioner it will be considered and if it is found that the petitioner is entitled for relief the same will be granted. 3. Thus, I direct the petitioner to file fresh representation before the respondent no. 3 within four weeks from today and if it is found that the petitioner is entitled to get any benefit, the same will be extended to him within the period of twelve weeks from the date of filing of the representation. 4. It is further directed that if the matter is required to be placed before any Committee the same should also be done by the respondents and considered. 5. If it is found that the petitioner is not entitled for the relief as claimed, a reasoned order should be passed and communicated to the petitioner. 6. With the aforesaid direction, this writ petition is disposed of. (ANANDA SEN, J.) Tanuj/