Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28602 (JHR)

M/S ANIL KUMAR SINGH THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR, SRI ANIL KUMAR SINGH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

WPC/2222/2025 · 2025-09-25

Rajesh Shankar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:30115-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 2222 of 2025 M/S ANIL KUMAR SINGH through its Proprietor, Sri Anil Kumar Singh, son of Sri Govind Prasad Singh, aged about 57 years, office at Shastrinagar, Giridih, P.O. Shastrinagar, P.S. Giridih (Town), District Giridih. ... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Rural Development, Govt. of Jharkhand, Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi. 3. The Engineer-in-Chief, Rural Work Department, Govt. of Jharkhand, Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi. 4. The Chief Engineer, Department of Rural Development (Rural Works Affairs), Engineers Building, Katchery, P.O. GPO, P.S. Kotwali, District Ranchi. 5. The Superintending Engineer, Department of Rural Development, Works Circle, Giridih, P.O. & P.S. Giridih, District Giridih. 6. The Executive Engineer, Rural Works Department, Works Division, Giridih, 3rd Floor, New Collectorate Building, Paparwatand, Giridih, P.O. & P.S. Giridih, District Giridih. 7. M/s Jharkhand Baba Construction through its Director, Ashish Kumar, son of Dashrath Modi, resident of Hirodih, Jamua, P.O. & P.S. Jamua, District Giridih. 8. M/s Anand Engineering Enterprises through its Partner Sri Krishan Murari Roy, son of Bateshwar Ray, resident of village Khesro, P.O. Pesham, P.S. Birni, District Giridih. ... Respondents --------- CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR --------- For the Petitioner: Mr. Mahesh Tewari, Advocate For the State: Mr. Piyush Chitresh, A.C. to A.G. --------- 05/Dated: 25.09.2025 Tarlok Singh Chauhan, C.J.(Oral) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he is under instructions not to press this writ petition. 2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. (Tarlok Singh Chauhan, C.J.) (Rajesh Shankar, J.) September 25, 2025 N.A.F.R. Manoj/Pramanik/Cp.2