Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28601 (KAR)

ALUMELAMMA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/16746/2025 · 2025-06-13

E S Indiresh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20407 WP No. 16746 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.16746 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: ALUMELAMMA W/O KAMBALAHALLI VENKATAREDDY. AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS. R/A KADEHALLI VILLAGE, HAMPASANDRA POST-561209, GUDIBANDE TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. CHETHAN A.C., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, VIKASA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT, CHIKKABALLAPUR-562101. Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20407 WP No. 16746 of 2025 3. THE ADDITIONAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT, CHIKKABALLAPUR-562101. 4. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, CHIKKABALLAPUR SUB DIVISION, CHIKKABALLAPUR-562101. 5. THE TAHSILDAR, GUDIBANDE TALUK, GUDIBANDE-561209. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. NAVYA SHEKAR, AGA ) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE UNDATED ENDORSEMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE 2ND AND 3RD RESPONDENTS REJECTING THE CONVERSION APPLICATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 27.02.2024 BEARING NO.629376 (ANNEXURES A AND B) ISSUED BY RESPONDENT NO.3 DATED 27.02.2024; ISSUE A DECLARATION THAT THE CONVERSION APPLICATION NO.629376 DATED 27.2.2024 IS DEEMED TO BE ALLOWED UNDER SECTION 95 OF THE KARNATAKA LAND REVENUE ACT, 1964. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20407 WP No. 16746 of 2025 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER 1. Smt. Navya Shekar, learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for the respondents. 2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. 3. In this writ petition, petitioner is assailing the rejection of conversion application made by the petitioner, as per order dated 27.02.2024 (Annexure-A and B), passed by respondent No.3. 4. In that view of the matter, as the impugned orders are appealable in nature, petitioner is permitted to approach the competent Tribunal for redressal of her grievances. 5. With this observation, writ petition is disposed of. 6. Consequently, I.A.1/2025 does not survive for consideration. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE sac List No.: 1 Sl No.: 28