15th July, 2025 (AK) 01 F.A.T 164 of 2022 Hare Krishna De alias Harekrishna Dey Vs. Ashok Kumar Roy and another Mr. Sourav Sen Mr. J,G. Mandal Mr. S. Rakshit Ms. A. Chakraborty ...for the appellant. Mr. Angshuman Chakraborty Mr. Shivaji Mitra ...for the respondents. 1. Learned counsel for the plaintiff/respondent no.1 submits that the portion of the impugned decree, whereby a sale deed was directed to be executed, had already been executed previously, although the execution case is still pending in respect of possession. 2. As such, the direction in that regard in the judgment dated July 10, 2025 is redundant. 3. It being so, no further order is required to be passed in that regard, since the appeal has already been disposed of. (Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J.) (Uday Kumar, J.)