203 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP-2978-2001 (O&M) Date of Decision: 15.07.2025 Sushil Kumar and Others ...Petitioners Vs. State Of Haryana and Others ...Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- Ms. Promila Nain, Advocate and Mr. Abhishek Rawat, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Raman Sharma, Addl. A.G., Haryana. **** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioners through instant petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India are seeking setting aside of action of respondent No.3 whereby they were not allowed to attend their duties. 2. Learned counsel representing the petitioners submits that she has no instructions, however, she may be granted liberty to move an appropriate application within three months from today, if cause survives. 3. Dismissed with aforesaid liberty. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 15.07.2025 Prince Chawla Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No PRINCE CHAWLA 2025.07.16 09:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document