Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28600 (CAL)

SARIFUL ISLAM v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA(P)/292/2022 · 2025-09-10

Smita Das De, Sujoy Paul

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

September 10, 2025 Sl. No.10 Court No.8 s.biswas WPA(P) 292 of 2022 Sariful Islam vs. The State of West Bengal and others Mr. Sabyasachi Chatterjee Mr. Sayan Banerjee Mr. Kiran Sk. ... for the petitioners 1. Mr. Sabyasachi Chatterjee, learned counsel appears for the petitioner. None appears for the respondents. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the period of contract of excavation of sand which was initially given to the private respondent, is over. It is learnt that he is given another contract for future years. Apart from that the damage he has caused during the previous contract is to be assessed. For these reasons, the petitioners may be given liberty to approach the National Green Tribunal. 3. Nobody appears to oppose the prayer in the petition. The PIL is disposed of reserving liberty to the petitioner to file a proceeding before the appropriate forum. (Sujoy Paul, J.) (Smita Das De, J.)