ABDUL SATTAR ALIAS CHHOTU RAI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./469/2025 · 2025-03-26
Rongon Mukhopadhyay
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2860 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2860 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 469 of 2025
Abdul Sattar @ Chhotu Rai, S/o Kutubuddin Ray, R/o Vill- Muslim Muhalla, P.O.- Balidih, P.S.- Balidih, Dist.- Bokaro
--- --- Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand
--- --- Opposite Party
--- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY ---
For the Petitioner : Mr. Ashok Kr. Singh, Adv.
For the O.P. : Mr. Vijoy Kr. Sinha, A.P.P.
--- 04/26.03.2025 Heard Mr. Ashok Kr. Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Vijoy Kr. Sinha, learned A.P.P.
The prayer for bail of the petitioner was earlier rejected by this Court in B.A. No. 1960 of 2023.
Submission has been advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner that two of the co-accused, namely, Saddam Hussain and Md. Arif have been granted bail by this Court. It has further been submitted that the petitioner is in custody since
23.11.2022. Learned counsel adds that out of 10 charge sheet witnesses, only 6 have been examined so far.
Mr. Vijoy Kr. Sinha, learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
Regard being had to the fact that the case of the petitioner appears to be on a different footing to that of the co- accused, who have been granted bail by this Court. I am not inclined to re-consider his prayer for bail which stands rejected once again.
This application stands rejected.
(Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.) Preet/-