Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28592 (HP)

Balbir Singh v. HRTC

EX.PT/350/2024 · 2025-04-02

Sandeep Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition (T) No.350 of 2025 Date of Decision: 02.04.2025 _____________________________________________________________________ Balbir Singh ……...Petitioner Versus HRTC and Another …....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioner: Mr. Vikas Rajput, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Dheeraj K. Vashisht, Advocate. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) By way of present execution petition, prayer has been made by the petitioner for implementation and execution of order/judgment dated 04.07.2024, passed by Coordinate Bench of this Court in CWP(OA) No.2875 of 2020, titled Balbir Singh Vs. HRTC and Another, whereby direction came to be issued to respondents to consider the case of the petitioner within a period of six days in light of judgment dated 09.11.2023, passed in CWPOA No.2343 of 2020, titled Vikram Singh Vs. HRTC. Since no action, whatsoever, came to be taken at the behest of the respondents pursuant to aforesaid direction, present petitioner has approached this Court in the instant proceedings. 2. Mr. Dheeraj K. Vashisht, Advocate, while putting in appearance on behalf of the respondents, states that though he has 2 every reason to presume and believe that by now, order/judgment sought to be executed, must have been complied with in its totality, but if not, same would be definitely complied with within a period of six weeks from today. 3. Consequently, in view of the fair stand adopted by learned counsel representing the respondents, this Court sees no reason to keep present petition alive and accordingly, same is disposed of with direction to the respondents to do the needful in terms of judgment sought to be executed, within a period of six weeks, failing which petitioner would be at liberty to get the present petition revived so that appropriate action in accordance with law is taken towards the implementation of the order/judgment. April 02, 2025 (Sandeep Sharma), (Rajeev Raturi) Judge