SARDAR @ JANGA S/O MUNSHIRAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/11019/2025 · 2025-08-29
Praveer Bhatnagar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 28581 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 28581 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:34606] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11019/2025 Sardar @ Janga S/o Munshiram, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Rajwas, Police Station Baroni, District Tonk, Presently Resident Of Nai Basti, Village Ganeshpura, Surajpura, Police Station Dausa Sadar, District Dausa Presently Khanabados Dera Ring Road, Tan Gram Jayrajpura, Police Station Shivdaspura, District Jaipur South. (At Present Petitioner Confined At Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arvind Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
Order 29/08/2025
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 198/2025 registered at Police Station Sanganer Sadar, District Jaipur City (South) for the offences under Sections 305(a) and 331(3) of BNS.
2.
Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the offences alleged against the accused- petitioner are exclusively triable by Magistrate. The accused- petitioner is in custody since long and the trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed. [2025:RJ-JP:34606] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-11019/2025]
3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the fact that the offences alleged against the accused-petitioner are exclusively triable by Magistrate, the accused-petitioner is in custody since long and the trial of the case may take considerable time, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Sardar @ Janga S/o Munshiram, in connection with FIR No. 198/2025 registered at Police Station Sanganer Sadar, District Jaipur City (South), shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. The concerned Court would verify the addresses of the petitioner as well as the sureties through concerned SHO and after satisfying that the given addresses in the bail bonds are correct, shall release the petitioner on bail. 7. The accused-petitioner is also directed to mark his presence on 10th and 25th of every month till conclusion of trial before the concerned police station. The SHO of the concerned police station is directed to maintain a regular register marking the presence of the accused-petitioner and shall send the presence report of the accused-petitioner on the same day to the concerned Trial Court
[2025:RJ-JP:34606] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-11019/2025] without any delay. In case of any breach to the above condition, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 8.
The accused-petitioner is also directed to submit his present address along with the mobile number to the concerned SHO and the concerned SHO shall verify the said address and the mobile number. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/5