PAWAN KUMAR AND OTHERS v. HIRDESH KUMAR SINGH COMMISSIONER SECRETARY TRANSPORT DEPTT AND OTHERS
CCP(S)/113/2022 · 2025-08-19
Ma Chowdhary
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2858 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2858 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CCP(S) No. 113/2022
Pawan Kumar & Ors.
….. Petitioner(s)
Through: None.
Vs
Hirdesh Kumar Singh & Ors. .…. Respondent(s)
Through: None.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M. A. CHOWDHARY, JUDGE
ORDER (19.08.2025)
There is no representation on behalf of the petitioners and so was the case on the previous date of hearing as well.
Vide order dated 14.05.2025, learned counsel for the respondents had stated that judgment has been complied with and that may be the reason that there is no representation on behalf of the respondents.
Be that as it may, the contempt petition is disposed of and proceedings are dropped, however, with a liberty to the petitioners to seek its restoration, in case cause survives.
(M. A. CHOWDHARY)
JUDGE
Jammu 19.08.2025 Neha-1
Serial No. 46