Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28579 (RAJ)

PRAHLAD S/O SHRI POORAN SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLW/1132/2025 · 2025-09-24

Avneesh Jhingan, Baljinder Singh Sandhu

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:39335-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Criminal Writ Petition (Parole) No. 1132/2025 Prahlad S/o Shri Pooran Singh, Aged About 44 Years, R/o Jagmohan Ka Pura, Police Station Rajakheda, District Dholpur (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Open Air Camp Sewar, Bharatpur). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department Of Home, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Director General Of Prisons, Directorate Prison, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. The Superintendent, Central Jail, Sewar, Bharatpur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Govind Prasad Rawat For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, Dy. GA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU Order 24/09/2025 1. This petition is filed seeking direction to the respondent to release the petitioner on permanent parole without furnishing of two solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- each. 2. The petitioner was convicted under Sections 148, 364, 302 of IPC and 3/25 of the Arms Act in Session Case No.31/2011 and was sentenced for life imprisonment. The prayer of the petitioner for permanent parole was allowed vide order dated 31.07.2023. The petitioner was ordered to be released on permanent parole subject to furnishing of two solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- each. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is no property in the name of the petitioner and his children are minor. [2025:RJ-JP:39335-DB] (2 of 2) [CRLW-1132/2025] Submission is that petitioner is not in a position to furnish solvent surety bonds but is ready to give personal bond. 4. Learned Deputy Government Advocate submits that petitioner while being released on parole earlier had furnished solvent surety bonds. 5. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner on instructions from client restricts the prayer that considering the weak financial position, the petitioner be released on furnishing of one surety bond and one personal bond. 6. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the pleadings. 7. With the reply filed by the respondent, the financial status report is annexed as Annexure-R2 wherein, it is stated that there is no property in the name of the petitioner. However, the father of the petitioner owns two bigha sixteen biswa of the land and the financial position of the petitioner is not sound. 8. Considering the financial status report annexed with the reply, the order granting permanent parole to the petitioner is modified to the extent that the petitioner shall be released subject to furnishing of one solvent surety bond of Rs.50,000/- to the satisfaction of the jail authorities and furnishing of personal bond of Rs. 50,000/-. 9. The criminal writ petition (Parole) is partly allowed. (BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU),J (AVNEESH JHINGAN),J RIYA/71